Apart from getting lines memorized and standing next to a crowd on a stage, you should understand different techniques that will help you bring the character into life. Of course, most acting styles are efficient ways and reasons, and we cannot say which one is the best for your specific needs.
The approach is different, and that is what the most significant difference is. Some people decide to consider cheap beginner acting classes in NYC so that they can learn more about this one way or another.
In both ways, the style you choose will depend on the nature of part that you are playing as well as the character you have to become. On the other hand, it will also affect the way you will enter and become a role you wanted.
That is the main reason why we decided to present you differences between classical and method acting:
Some people consider it as a Shakespearean style, and you probably know what we are talking about here because it is a prominent choice and method used in the British theater. The main focus is on precision and control in performance, which means that classically trained actors are action-oriented, and they will show less emotion than method style.
Of course, we are not talking here that classical actors will not provide you with the appropriate emotion that will allow you to reach catharsis, and they will not be flat when compared with other acting styles.
The main difference between method and classical acting is that traditional actors tend to bring their character to life by combining meticulously crafted script and their interpretation of the character.
In moments when method acting gives us the ability to improvise with the idea to reach the perfection when it comes to emotional perspective, classical acting will demand from you the exactness that you will not find in other styles.
Therefore, they have to memorize everything before they start to interpret the character. In other words, it is less likely that classically trained actor will create script deviation when compared with method acting technique.
Of course, some people think that this particular style could be overacting and over-the-top at times, but it is essential to provide comprehensive and reliable delivery of well-written lines because that has the power to move the audience and make a significant impact.
Classical acting started back in the 18th century, and still, most people are choosing it instead of other styles and possibilities. Check this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_acting to see what classical acting is all about.
Method acting is an entirely different approach to acting technique because it requires from an actor to dredge up in powerful and real emotions with the idea to create an existing character.
For instance, when there are a tragic scene and actor is on his knees, the tears are an essential part of the play because there has to be serenity that will drive the audience to think that everything, which is going on, is genuine.
If you want to make this particular magic happen, you have to focus on painful or sad experience from your own life and to create an emotional background that will not interfere with the character you are playing. The tears will be real and character will feel more real, so the illusion of stage and acting will remain tight with the real life we live in.
Lee Strasberg, who was the instructor at the Actors Studio, before he created the institute, developed this particular style. The leading theory of this specific method is that an actor should completely relive the character that he/she is playing and even when they are not on the stage.
For those particular reasons, we had seen examples of people that decided to refuse the character before they reached the last scene of the film. Some performers will go to the point where they will inhabit the role, which includes their everyday life activities and other habits that will help them understand the purpose and make it more realistic than it is.
They are creating a gap between acting and reality, where the audience cannot see the actor because the intention was masked by the method approach. However, we cannot conclude which one is the best for you, because there are advantages and disadvantages of both types. Everything depends on your creativity and focus.